So,
burntbythesun02 and I have been having a little back and forth about the state of modern political science. I commented that The Case for Democracy by Natan Sharansky was the first polisci book I remember to actually posit a falsifiable hypothesis. I have a general disgust for the current state of political science as being the study of who thinks he is more right about why other people are wrong. Burnt believes that there are political scientists who actually do something other than write long diatribes trying to convince others that they know how everyone thinks, even though they couldn't market water in the Sahara.
In any case, I challenged sunny boy to read The Case for Democracy and he said he would, if I read the book The Tragedy of Great Power by an antisemite. Now, doesn't tan so well did not know (as most people who are not Jewish do not) that the author is an antisemite. (I do not throw that word around lightly.) He is an eminent professor who decided to publish the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as a working paper under the Kennedy School's prestigious name. That is a whole other discussion.
Anyway, I would not ignore a book by any Nazi that burnt thought was worthwhile. I got the book, and I started reading it. I will admit I was skeptical from the minute I opened the book. After reading the first footnote, I decided that if I am going to read this and be subjected to another treatise of political "science" then I am getting out my crucible and bunsen burner.
( Smells like smoke.Collapse )I hope the next 400 pages will be superior. At least, I hope the other footnotes will actually cite facts in the sentences they follow as opposed to giving the impression that a "quote" was actually a quote from some exstant work while constructing a straw man.
Current Mood:
cynical